Interactive Breakout Discussions
This session features various discussion groups that are led by a moderator/s who ensures focused conversations around the key issues listed. Attendees choose to join a specific group and the small, informal setting facilitates sharing of ideas and active
networking. It will be followed by a refreshment break in the exhibit hall.
WEDNESDAY, 28 NOVEMBER, 14:50-16:00
Preclinical Modeling and Combination Therapy Development: Models and Strategies
Moderators:
Sara Colombetti, PhD, Head of Oncology Discovery Pharmacology, Roche Innovation Center Zürich
Michael Rugaard Jensen, PhD, Director, Head of ONC Discovery Pharmacology Basel, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
- Advantages and limitations of preclinical mouse models for immunotherapy evaluation
- How can 3D models help drug discovery in cancer immunotherapy?
- What other animal species, besides the mouse, could be evaluated for in vivo testing of cancer immunotherapies?
- Combination therapy: preclinical considerations
Next Generation 3D Models and Co-Clinical Trials
Moderator:
Christian Schmees, PhD, Head of Tumor Biology, Molecular Biology Department, NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen
- Which approaches can be applied to better mimic in vivo physiology in 3D disease models?
- iPSCs as a reproducible source for macrophages in 3D co-cultures.
- Definition and control of comprehensive, international quality standards for patient-derived 3D models.
- Medical informatics approaches to establish internal and external access points to clinical data and for data integration.
- Application of 3D disease models in precision medicine approaches.
Drug Bioactivation: The Good, The Bad and The UglyModerator:Axel Pähler, E.R.T., DMPK/PD Leader, Pharmaceutical Sciences (PS), Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center
- Bioactivation as a risk factor for drug induced toxicities such as DILI
- Case studies of reactive metabolite formation linked to safety failures and key learnings
- Bioactivation reactions that determine the pharmacological mode of action
- Key learnings from old drugs and novel strategies to design selective new inhibitors for safe use
Use of Modeling Tools and Strategies for Predicting ADME-Tox Properties
Maria A. Miteva, PhD, Research Director, Molécules Thérapeutiques in silico (MTi), Inserm Institute
- Machine-learning or structure-based approaches for ADME-Tox prediction and optimization?
- Should the modeling tools for toxicity predicting be specific for xenobiotics and drugs?
- Quantum-mechanics methods for drug metabolism prediction
CRISPR/Cas9 for Drug Discovery ApplicationsModerators:John Doench, PhD, Associate Director, Genetic Perturbation Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
- Impact of CRISPR/Cas9 for drug discovery in pharma and academia
- Applications for functional screens, creating cell lines and disease models
- Design and optimization of low- and high-throughput screens using CRISPR approaches
- Application of CRISPR-knockout, -activation and -inhibition
- Impact of new CRISPR technologies and reagents
Use of Chemical Biology and Chemical Probes in Drug DiscoveryModerator:Paul Brennan, PhD, Associate Professor, Medicinal Chemistry, University of Oxford and Principal Investigator, Target Discovery Institute, Structural Genomics Consortium
- Main applications of Chemical Biology in Drug Discovery projects
- When should Chemical Biology be used in Discovery programs?
- Labelled and label-free proteomic techniques for target identification
Animal Models for FibrosisModerator:Bryan C. Fuchs, PhD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School
- Who has used what?
- Pros and cons of different models
- What looks promising
NASH Drug Development ChallengesModerator:Dean W. Hum, PhD, CSO, Genfit
- Role of biomarkers
- European v. FDA guidance
- Defining target population
THURSDAY, 29 NOVEMBER, 15:05-16:05
Microphysiological Systems for Drug ScreeningModerator:Hansjoerg Keller, PhD, Sr. Investigator I, Musculoskeletal, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
- Key advantages over classical 2D cell culture models
- Reliability and translatability of human systems
- Applicability, throughput and cost effectiveness
Human Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Use as A Massive Platform for Organoid GenerationModerator:Nuria Montserrat, PhD, Group Leader, Pluripotency for organ regeneration, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC)
- How to benefit from bioengineering approaches in order to enhance organoid maturation/vascularization
- Immediate applications from 3D bioprinting using organoids
- Ethic issues related to the use of human pluripotent stem cells
Immunological Determinants of Response to Systemic Therapy In CancerModerators:Sofia Braga, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Instituto CUF Oncologia, NOVA Medical SchoolAbraham Silva Carmona, Pathologist, Definiens, Subsidiary of Medimmune/AstraZeneca
- Neoplastic cell attributes: neoantigen load, mutational burden, mismatch repair deficient cells / high microsatelite instability
- Immune system attributes: baseline T cell infiltration; cytotoxic "antitumor" T cells, low tolerogenic T cells, PDL1, CD8, B2M; TCR sequencing; T cell clones; intact immunity
- Translational biomarkers in pharma research: strategy and timeline
Liquid Biopsy in IO researchModerator:Evi Lianidou, PhD, Professor of Clinical Chemistry, University of Athens
- Tumor diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment
- Blood tests / biomarkers
- Mutational analysis of tumors and blood
Dish, Animal or Patient: How Can We Best Understand Neurodegenerative Disease?Moderator:Stuart W. Hughes, PhD, Director and Head of Pharmacology, Biological Sciences, Vertex Pharmaceuticals
- Is failure in neurodegenerative diseases related to a focus on inappropriate models?
- Can neurodegeneration truly be modeled in vitro?
- Should we pursue the biology of causation or progression?
- What does a ‘validate target’ mean when it comes to neurodegenerative diseases?
Should a Robust Translational Path from Animals to Humans be Required to Advance a Compound?Moderator:William Z. Potter, MD, PhD, Senior Advisor, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Should a biomarker of drug effect in human brain always be required to advance a novel compound into efficacy studies
- Does there need to be preclinical data with a homologous biomarkers (e.g. fMRI for both animals and humans)?
- If not, what constitutes adequate evidence that some brain effect observed in animals is occurring in humans?
- Given clinical need are there arguments to advance compounds with some biomarker of acute effect?